<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Of Whom I Am The Foremost - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-4b6f2bef" type="application/json"/><link>http://trefzger.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://trefzger.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:52:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 180</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/09/30/180/#comment-390322267</link><description>Thanks for posting this, brother!  Powerful; very powerful.  Thank you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Morizio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Setting things straight on ‘contextualization’</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/09/12/setting-things-straight-on-contextualization/#comment-337009247</link><description>Contextualization can be thought of as a form of pre-evangelism and pre-evangelism is not evangelism. So if we think of it in this sense, then by nature contextualization is not a watering down of the Gospel, because it is not evangelism. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One the one hand, you work to remove the unnecessary impediments, road-blocks and what have you that get in the way of one understanding the Gospel. On the other hand, you lower the cultural draw-bridges and whatever else that make possible a clear communication of the Gospel regardless of acceptance/rejection. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;~ Raj Rao</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rajesh Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Completed by the Spirit: Download the original paper</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/09/16/completed-by-the-spirit-download-the-original-paper/#comment-313288925</link><description>Hi Ed! Josh Wood pointed me to your paper. Would you mind sending me a copy in Word if you have it (ablakew@gmail.com)? I would like to shrink the font and print it out (I'm old school).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blake W</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:00:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Setting things straight on ‘contextualization’</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/09/12/setting-things-straight-on-contextualization/#comment-308692321</link><description>Excellent Ed. A GREAT place to go. A VERy needed corrective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid Ferguson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:08:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Setting things straight on ‘contextualization’</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/09/12/setting-things-straight-on-contextualization/#comment-308692097</link><description>Awesome Ed-  great place to to go. A very necessary corrective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid Ferguson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:08:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tempted and Tried</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/06/02/tempted-and-tried/#comment-216894904</link><description>Thanks for your kind words about my review.  God Bless!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Leake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An audio discussion of some of the arguments in Rob Bell’s ‘Love Wins’</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/05/23/an-audio-discussion-of-some-of-the-arguments-in-rob-bells-love-wins/#comment-210820703</link><description>Great overview, Ed. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Ferguson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:35:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Completed by the Spirit, Part 1: Five Propositions</title><link>http://www.trefzger.org/2011/05/23/completed-by-the-spirit-part-1-five-propositions/#comment-210322201</link><description>Good sfuff Ed.  I would like to see just a bit more about the transforming of our bodies as the final step of sanctification, or the ultimate achievement of sanctification, since scripture ties the remnant of sin in our lives specifically to the weak flesh we still possess.  I know it's hinted at here, but I for one think we can and maybe should speak more directly to it sanctification being the Spirit's work to kill the old flesh and give birth to the bodies we've been promised when the final installment of union comes at His return.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Fuchs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 23:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
